Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain. SMART 2016-2020

Objectives: To determine susceptibility to the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem/relebactam in clinical isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream (BSI) infections in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study in SPAIN during 2016 – 2020.Methods: Broth microdilution MICs for imipenem/relebactam and comparators were determined by a central laboratory against isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MICs were interpreted using EUCAST-2021 breakpoints.Results: In total, 5,210 Enterobacterales and 1,418 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were analyzed. Imipenem/relebactam inhibited 98.8% of Enterobacterales. Distinguishing by source of infection susceptibility was 99.1% in BSI, 99.2% in IAI, 97.9% in RTI, and 99.2% in UTI. Of intensive care unit isolates (ICU) 97.4% were susceptible and of non-ICU isolates 99.2% were susceptible. In Enterobacterales, activity against Class A, Class B and Class D carbapenemases was 96.2%, 15.4% and 73.2%, respectively. In P. aeruginosa, imipenem/relebactam was active in 92.2% of isolates. By source of infection it was 94.8% in BSI, 92.9% in IAI, 91.7% in RTI, and 93.1% in UTI. An 88.7% of ICU isolates and 93.6% of non-ICU isolates were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. Imipenem/relebactam remained active against P. aeruginosa ceftazidime-resistant (76.3%), cefepime-resistant (73.6%), imipenem-resistant (71.5%) and piperacillin-resistant (78.7%) isolates. Of all multidrug-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa isolates, 75.1% and 46.2%, respectively, were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. (AU)

Objetivos: Determinar la sensibilidad a la nueva combinación de β-lactámico e inhibidor de β-lactamasas imipenem/relebactam en aislados clínicos procedentes de infecciones intraabdominales (IIA), urinarias (ITU), respiratorias (ITR) y bacteriemias del estudio SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) en ESPAÑA durante 2016 - 2020. Métodos. Se determinó la CMI mediante microdilución en caldo de imipenem/relebactam y antibióticos comparadores frente a aislados de Enterobacterales y Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Las CMI se analizaron empleando los puntos de corte EUCAST-2021. Resultados: En total, se incluyeron 5.210 aislados de Enterobacterales y 1.418 aislados de P. aeruginosa. Imipenem/ relebactam fue activo frente al 98,8% de los Enterobacterales. Distinguiendo por foco de infección, la sensibilidad fue del 99,1% en bacteriemia, del 99,2% en IIA, del 97,9% en ITR y del 99,2% en ITU. El 97,4% de los aislados procedentes de unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) fueron sensibles, y el 99,2% de los aislados no procedentes de UCI. En Enterobacterales, la sensibilidad frente a carbapenemasas de clase A, clase B y clase D fue del 96,2%, 15,4% y 73,2%, respectivamente. En P. aeruginosa,imipenem/relebactam fue activo en el 92,2% de los aislados. Distinguiendo por foco de infección, la sensibilidad frente a P. aeruginosa fue del 94,8% en bacteriemia, 92,9% en IIA, 91,7% en ITR y 93,1% en ITU. El 88,7% de los aislados de la UCI y el 93,6% de los aislados no procedentes de UCI fueron sensibles a imipenem/relebactam. Imipenem/relebactam fue activo frente a aislados de P. aeruginosa resistentes a ceftazidima (76,3%), cefepima (73,6%), imipenem (71,5%) y piperacilina/tazobactam (78,7%). Frente a los aislados de P. aeruginosa clasificados como MDR o DTR, el 75,1% y el 46,2%, respectivamente, fueron sensibles a imipenem/relebactam. (AU)

Predictors of inappropriate antimicrobial prescription: Eight-year point prevalence surveys experience in a third level hospital in Spain.

Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) have already demonstrated clinical benefits. We aimed to describe the Point Prevalence Surveys (PPS) methodology implemented in our hospital as an efficient tool to guide ASP strategies. Annually repeated PPS were conducted from 2012 to 2019 at a 750-bed university hospital in South Spain. Key quality indicators and inappropriateness of antimicrobial treatment, defined strictly according to local guidelines, were described. Variables associated with inappropriate treatment were identified by bi/multivariable analysis. A total of 1,600 patients were included. We found that 49% of the prescriptions were inappropriate due to unnecessary treatment (14%), not first line drug recommended (14%), inadequate drug according to microbiological results (9%), unsuitable doses (8%), route (3%) or duration (7%). Samples collection presented a significant protective effect together with sepsis presentation at onset and intensive care unit admission. However, age, receiving an empirical treatment and an unknown or urinary source of the infections treated were independent risk factors for inappropriateness. Site and severity of infection were documented in medical charts by prescribers (75 and 61% respectively). PPS may allow identifying the main risk factors for inappropriateness. This simple methodology may be useful for ASP to select modifiable factors to be prioritized for targeted interventions.

MixInYeast: A Multicenter Study on Mixed Yeast Infections.

Invasive candidiasis remains one of the most prevalent systemic mycoses, and several studies have documented the presence of mixed yeast (MY) infections. Here, we describe the epidemiology, clinical, and microbiological characteristics of MY infections causing invasive candidiasis in a multicenter prospective study. Thirty-four centers from 14 countries participated. Samples were collected in each center between April to September 2018, and they were sent to a reference center to confirm identification by sequencing methods and to perform antifungal susceptibility testing, according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). A total of 6895 yeast cultures were identified and MY occurred in 150 cases (2.2%). Europe accounted for the highest number of centers, with an overall MY rate of 4.2% (118 out of 2840 yeast cultures). Of 122 MY cases, the most frequent combinations were Candida albicans/C. glabrata (42, 34.4%), C. albicans/C. parapsilosis (17, 14%), and C. glabrata/C. tropicalis (8, 6.5%). All Candida isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B, 6.4% were fluconazole-resistant, and two isolates (1.6%) were echinocandin-resistant. Accurate identification of the species involved in MY infections is essential to guide treatment decisions.

Infección de prótesis articular por Peptostreptococcus canis y Bacteroides pyogenes / Peptostreptococcus canis and Bacteroides pyogenes prosthetic joint infection

No disponible

Monitoring the antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms involved in intraabdominal and urinary tract infections recovered during the SMART study (Spain, 2016 and 2017) / Seguimiento de la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de microorganismos gramnegativos procedentes de infecciones intraabdominales y urinarias del estudio SMART (España, 2016 y 2017)

Introduction: Continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance is recommended by Public Health authorities. We up-dated data from the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance study in Spain. Material and methods: The antimicrobial susceptibility data and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI) (n=1,429) and urinary tract (UTI) (n=937) infections during the 2016- 2017 SMART study in 10 Spanish hospitals were analysed. Results: Escherichia coli was the most frequently microorganism isolated (48.3% and 53.7%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (11.5% and 21.9%) in IAIs and UTIs, respectively. Figures for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 9.0% and 6.1%, being more frequently recovered from patients with nosocomial infections. Overall, 9.9% (IAI) and 14.0% (UTI) of E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis isolates were ESBL-producers, being Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.5%) from UTI of nosocomial origin the most frequent. ESBL-producers were higher in patients >60 years in both IAIs and UTIs. As in previous years, amikacin (96.3%-100% susceptibility), ertapenem (84.2%-100%) and imipenem (70.3%- 100%) were the most active antimicrobials tested among Enterobacterales species. The activity of amoxicillin-clavulanic, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin susceptibility was lower, particularly among ESBL-producers. Ertapenem susceptibility (88.9%-100%) was retained in ESBL-E. coli isolates that were resistant to these antimicrobials but decreased (28.6%-100%) in similar isolates of K. pneumoniae. Conclusions: Continuous antimicrobial resistance surveillance from the SMART study reveals overall maintenance of ESBL-producers in Spain, although with higher presence in isolates from UTIs than from IAIs. Moreover, ertapenem activity was high in E. coli irrespective of ESBL production but decreased in K. pneumoniae, particularly among ESBL-producers

Introducción: Las autoridades de Salud Pública recomiendan la vigilancia continua de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos. Se actualizan los datos del estudio SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) en España. Material y métodos: Se analizaron los datos de sensibilidad antimicrobiana y la producción de betalactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE) en aislamientos obtenidos en el estudio SMART de infecciones intraabdominales (IIA) (n=1.429) y del tracto urinario (ITU) (n=937) durante 2016-2017 en 10 hospitales españoles. Resultados: Escherichia coli fue el microorganismo más frecuente (54,5% y 57,5%, respectivamente), seguido de Klebsiella spp. (18,4% y 25,4%) en IIA y en ITU. En Pseudomonas aeruginosa estas cifras fueron 9% y 6%, siendo más frecuente en la infección nosocomial. El 9,9% (IIA) y el 14% (ITU) del to-tal de los aislados de E. coli, Klebsiella spp. y Proteus mirabilis producían BLEE, obteniéndose la tasa más alta en Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.5%) en ITU nosocomial. El mayor porcentaje de aislados con BLEE se observó en pacientes >60 años, tanto en IIA como en ITU. Como en años anteriores, amikacina (sensibilidad 96,3%-100%), ertapenem (84,2%-100%) e imipenem (70,3%-100%) fueron los antimicrobianos más activos en Enterobacterales. La sensibilidad a amoxicilina-ácido clavulánico, piperacilina-tazobactam y ciprofloxacino fue menor, en particular en los productores de BLEE. La sensibilidad a ertapenem (88,9%-100%) se mantuvo en E. coli con BLEE resistente a estos antimicrobianos, pero disminuyó (28,6%-100%) en aislados similares de K. pneumoniae. Conclusiones: La vigilancia continua de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos en el estudio SMART revela el mantenimiento de la frecuencia de aislados productores de BLEE en España, pero con mayor presencia en las ITUs que en las IIAs. Además, la sensibilidad a ertapenem fue alta en E. coli con independencia de la producción de BLEE, pero disminuyó en K. pneumoniae, sobre todo en los productores de BLEE

Antimicrobial susceptibility trends and evolution of isolates with extended spectrum Beta-lactamases among Gram-negative organisms recovered during the SMART study in Spain (2011-2015) / Evolución de la sensibilidad y de los aislados productores de Beta-lactamasas de espectro extendido en microorganismos gramnegativos en el estudio SMART en España (2011-2015)

Introduction. The SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance study monitors antimicrobial susceptibility and extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in Gram-negative bacilli recovered from intra-abdominal infections (IAI). Material and methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 5,343 isolates from IAI recovered in 11 centres during the 2011-2015 SMART-Spain program was analysed by standard microdilution (EUCAST criteria) and compared with that from 2002-2010. ESBLs were phenotypically detected. Results. Escherichia coli, the most common isolate, significantly decreased in community acquired IAI (60.9% 2002-2010 vs. 56.1% 2011-2015, P=0.0003). It was followed in prevalence by Klebsiella pneumoniae that increased both in the community (8.9% vs. 10.8%, P=0.016) and nosocomial (9.2% vs. 10.8%, P=0.029) IAI and P. aeruginosa, which significantly increased in community acquired IAI (5.6% vs. 8.0%, P=0.0003). ESBLs were more prevalent in K. pneumoniae (16.3%) than in E. coli(9.5%) of nosocomial origin and were more frequently isolated from elderly patients (>60 years). Considering all Enterobacteriaceae, ertapenem (92.3-100%) and amikacin (95.5%-100%) were the most active antimicrobials. Ertapenem activity, unlike amoxicillin-clavulanate or piperacillin-tazobactam, remained virtually unchanged in ESBL (100%) and non-ESBL (98.8%) E. coli producers. Its activity decreased in ESBL-K. pneumonia (74.7%) but was higher than that of amoxicillin-clavulanate (14.0%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (24.0%). Interestingly, ertapenem susceptibility was maintained in >60% of ESBL isolates that were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam or luoroquinolones. Conclusions. SMART-Spain results support current guidelines which include ertapenem as empiric treatment in mild-moderate community-acquired IAI, particularly with ESBL producers. These recommendations will need to be updated with the recently introduction of new antimicrobials

Introducción. El estudio SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) monitoriza la sensibilidad antimicrobiana y las β-lactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE) en bacilos gramnegativos obtenidos de infecciones intraabdominales (IIA). Material y Métodos. Se ha analizado la sensibilidad antimicrobiana (microdilución estándar, criterios EUCAST) y las BLEE (detección fenotípica) de 5.343 aislados de IIA en 11 centros del programa SMART-España durante 2011-2015 en comparación con 2002-2010. Resultados. Escherichia coli, el microorganismo más prevalente, disminuyó significativamente en las IIA de origen comunitario (60,9% 2002-2010 vs. 56,1% 2011-2015, P=0,0003). Fue seguido en prevalencia por Klebsiella pneumoniae que aumentó tanto en IIA comunitaria (8,9% vs. 10,8%, P=0,016) como nosocomial (9,2% vs. 10,8%, P=0,029) y por P. aeruginosa que aumentó en la IIA comunitaria (5,6% vs. 8,0%, P=0,0003). Las BLEE fueron más prevalentes en la IIA nosocomial por K. pneumoniae(16,3%) que por E. coli(9,5%), siendo más frecuentes en pacientes de mayor edad (>60 años). Considerando todas las Enterobacteriaceae, ertapenem (92,3-100%) y amikacina (95,5%-100%) fueron los antimicrobianos más activos. La sensibilidad a ertapenem, al contrario que a amoxicilina-clavulánico o piperacilina-tazobactam, se mantuvo sin cambios en E. coli con (98,8%) y sin BLEE (100%). Su sensibilidad disminuyó en BLEE-K. pneumoniae (74,7%) pero fue mayor que la de amoxicilina-clavulánico (14,0%) o piperacilina-tazobactam (24,0%). Es de resaltar que esta actividad se mantuvo >60% en los aislados con BLEE resistentes a amoxicilina-clavulánico, piperacilina-tazobactam o fluoroquinolonas.Conclusiones. El estudio SMART-España sustenta las guías actuales que incluyen al ertapenem como tratamiento empírico en la IIA leve-moderada comunitaria, en particular con BLEE. Estas recomendaciones precisaran actualizarse con la reciente introducción de nuevos antimicrobianos

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms from intra abdominal infections and evolution of isolates with extended spectrum Beta-lactamases in the SMART study in Spain (2002-2010)

Introducción. El estudio SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) tiene como objetivo monitorizar la sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos de los microorganismos gramnegativos aislados en la infección intraabdominal, con especial seguimiento de los que producen Beta-lactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE). Material y métodos. Se han analizado por microdulución los datos de sensibilidad de 8.869 aislados recogidos en el estudio SMART en España entre 2002 y 2010 en el que han participado 16 centros. Resultados. Escherichia coli fue el patógeno más frecuente (60,9% en la infección intraabdominal adquirida en la comunidad y 49,9% en la nosocomial) seguido de Klebsiella pneumoniae (8,9% vs 9,2%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa fue más habitual en la infección nosocomial (5,6% comunitaria y 8,6% nosocomial). La frecuencia de aislados con BLEE fue: E. coli 8,7%, K. pneumoniae 8,4%, Klebsiella oxytoca 1,4% y Proteus mirabilis 1,6%. En los pacientes de mayor edad aumentó la proporción global de aislados con BLEE (6,8% en pacientes >60 años). Ertapenem y meropenem fueron los antimicrobianos más activos en el conjunto de las enterobacterias (rango de sensibilidad con criterios EUCAST, 89- 100%) y también entre los aislados con BLEE (95,5-100%). La actividad de amoxicilina/ácido clavulánico y piperacilina/tazobactam fue considerablemente inferior, en particular en los aislados con BLEE. Ertapenem mantuvo una buena actividad (sensibilidad >95%) en los productores de BLEE resistentes a amoxicilina/ácido clavulánico, piperacilina/tazobactam o fluoroquinolonas. Conclusiones. Los datos de sensibilidad del estudio SMART en España avalan las guías terapéuticas actuales de infecciónintraabdominal que sitúan al ertapenem como tratamiento empírico de elección, teniendo en cuenta sobre todo la elevada frecuencia de aislados con BLEE en nuestro medio(AU)

Introduction. The SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance study records the antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacilli obtain from intraabdominal infections with special focus in isolates with extended spectrum Beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Material and Methods. The antimicrobial susceptibility of 8,869 isolates was analyzed by microdilution during the SMART study performed in Spain from 2002 to 2010. Isolates were recovered in 16 centres. Results. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent pathogen (60.9% from intraabdominal infections acquired in the community and 49.9% in those from nosocomial origin) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.9% vs 9.2%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more common in intraabdominal infections from nosocomial origin (5.6% community and 8.6% nosocomial). Frequency of ESBL-producing isolates was: E. coli, 8.7%; K. pneumoniae, 8.4%; Klebsiella oxytoca, 1.4%; and Proteus mirabilis, 1.6%. Overall, ESBL-producing isolates were more frequently isolated from elderly patients (6.8% >60 years). Ertapenem and meropenem were the most active antimicrobials (susceptibility range with EUCAST criteria, 89.0-100%) when considering all Enterobacteriaceae isolates and also against ESBL producers (95.5-100%). Susceptibility of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam was lower, particularly among ESBL-producing isolates. Nevertheless, ertapenem maintained a good activity (susceptibility >95%) in ESBL-producers that were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam or fluoroquinolones. Conclusions. Antimicrobial susceptibility data from the SMART-Spain study reinforce current therapeutic guidelines of intraabdominal infections that include ertapenem as the empirical choice for treatment. This is also supported by the high frequency of ESBL-producers in our geographic area(AU)